i posit, the truth has a shape which we explore with language. we bounce concepts off of truth, and watch their trajectories, and by this, we call something true.
truth itself is intangible, not always persistent, not always visible, but it is there, for now, at least.
i think, most people don't explore all possibilities of truth, preferring to make repeatable and predictable bounces right back to their hand, and thus, narrowly defining what can be considered true.
the basis of this framework requires that you notice more than one thing can be true, even if those things seem to contradict.
what's next: